March 2, 2011
Intelligence is in your users, not in your data
Text mining has been around for a while now and has not delivered its full promise. While this is more or less systematically so in this great domain which we call computer science, this case is worth mentioning because of the extent of the failure. For instance, when the SQL language was invented, the idea was to make it become a natural query language which anyone can use. Even if it obviously failed to deliver such promise, it became nevertheless one of the most important everyday tools for the vast majority of programmers and almost none of them would imagine working without it. But with most domains related to artificial intelligence, and text mining is no exception, not only did the initial promise was not delivered, but we pretty much manage and exploit textual data the same way as we always did, without having the habit to use any text mining tool in our every day programming. Regular expression are still use much more commonly than any text mining function, even if they are complex in their format and limited in their scope. Text mining is still reserve for very important and very expensive projects which pretty much never work. And when they do provide a real value for a moment, they don’t manage to extend enough to change the paradigm: if it is not structured data, it is not usable data.



Comments(2)